|
The following is a brief description of selected projects and developments associated with the Dynatest Consulting Division.
They have been chosen to illustrate the diversity and extent of our experience, ranging from simple and routine pavement projects to complex and unusual ones.
More complete lists of projects are available, with Dynatest having completed well over 100 pavement evaluation projects over the past few years in the United States alone, plus at least an even larger number of pavement projects abroad
|
Heathrow International Airport, UK
|
| The majority of the taxiways have been tested using the Dynatest Heavy Weight Deflectometer to determine rehabilitation options. |
 |
Copenhagen International, Denmark |
| Yearly HWD testing for bearing capacity, RSP testing for roughness and rutting as well as construction quality control.
Establishing true profile of runway surfaces.
Controlling the compaction of crushed concrete.
|
 |
Roskilde Airport, Denmark |
| HWD testing and evaluation of airside pavements. |
 |
King Fahad International Airport, Saudi Arabia |
| In partnership with Gulf Engineering House a structural evaluation was performed by HWD testing of the Western Runway (16R-34L), Taxiway Bravo and Exits, including remaining life analysis.
In addition to this a functional survey regarding the roughness was also performed on the Runway and Taxiway using a RSP.
|
 |
King Khaled International Airport, Saudi Arabia |
| In partnership with Gulf Engineering House a structural evaluation was performed by FWD testing of the Primary (15L-33R) and Secondary Runway (15R-33L), including PCN calculation.
In addition to this a functional survey regarding the roughness was also performed on the Runway and Taxiway using a RSP.
|
 |
Pristina International Airport, Kosovo |
| Structural evaluation by HWD and analysis of Runway, Taxiways and Apron, including PCN calculations. |
 |
Bristol International Airport (UK) |
| Dynatest performed structural evaluation by HWD of Runway, Taxiways and Apron. |
 |
Oban Airfield, Scotland |
| Structural evaluation by HWD and analysis of Runway, Taxiway and Apron, including PCN calculation and overlay design. |
|
Freetown International Airport, Lungi Sierra Leone |
| Structural evaluation by HWD and analysis of Runway, Taxiways and Apron, including PCN calculations. |
|
Szolnok Airbase (Hungary) |
Dynatest performed structural evaluation by HWD and analysis of Runway, Taxiways and Apron.
The contract included structural and PCN calculations. |
 |
Stansted International Airport (UK) |
| Dynatest performed structural evaluation by HWD of Runway, Taxiways and Apron. |
 |
Amsterdam Airport Schiphol (Netherlands) |
| Structural evaluation by HWD of the new 5th Runway (Polderbaan) and calculation of the PCN. |
 |
Luton International Airport (UK) |
| Dynatest performed structural evaluation by HWD and analysis of Runway 08-26 and Taxiway Bravo + Charlie.
The contract included PCN calculations and Ground Penetrating Radar measurements.
|
 |
Belfast International Airport (Ireland) |
| Dynatest performed structural evaluation by HWD and analysis of Taxiway Charlie & Bravo.
The contract included PCN calculations and Ground Penetrating Radar measurements.
|
 |
RAF Bases Brize Norton and Waddington (UK) |
| Structural evaluation by HWD of the runways. |
Cardiff International Airport (UK) |
|
Dynatest performed structural evaluation by HWD and analysis of Runway 12-30 and Taxiway Alpha.
The contract included PCN calculations.
|
 |
JFK International Airport, USA |
|
Stage 1
All joints, corners and mid slabs where tested and analyzed on two teat strips.
Stage 2
All joints, corners and mid slabs where tested and analyzed on newly paved concrete slabs in tracts 8 and 9.
|
 |
Southwest Florida Regional Airport, USA |
|
Dynatest performed structural evaluation and analysis of runway 06-24, parallel taxiway and cross taxiways.
|
|
Gainsville Regional Airport, USA |
|
Dynatest performed non-destructive pavement testing on runway 28.
The objective of the test were to determine the structural condition and estimated remaining life based on projected traffic conditions.
|
|
Zanzibar International Airport, Tanzania |
|
Structural evaluation by HWD and Ground Penetrating Radar of Runway, Taxiway and Apron.
This included a structural analysis and PCN calculation.
|
|
RAF Base Leuchars (Scotland) |
|
Determination of the structural bearing capacity of a taxiway and calculation of the PCN.
|
 |
Jacksonville International Airport, USA |
|
Dynatest personnel collected and analyzed pavements at JIA in early October.
Some 400 slabs around the aprons were tested to estimate remaining life and structural condition as part of the Stage 2 Terminal Expansion project.
|
 |
Chattanooga Tennessee Metropolitan Airport |
|
Visual Inspection of all airside pavements.
Micro PAVER implementation.
HWD testing and evaluation of all airside pavements.
|
 |
Aarhus Airport, Denmark |
|
HWD testing and evaluation of all airside pavements.
Asphalt and concrete.
Determination of layer thickness' using the Boroscope method.
|
 |
RAF Base Mildenhall (UK) |
|
Determination of the structural bearing capacity of the concrete runway ends using HWD.
|
 |
Atlanta Hartsfield International Airport Atlanta Georgia |
|
Dynatest personnel collected and processed pavement deflection data and PCI data on over 4600 test points on Hartsfield Atlanta International Airport.
All runways and taxiways were evaluated.
HWD testing on runway 09R-27L to evaluate joint efficiencies and load transfer.
|
 |
Mather Airport, Sacramento, CA |
|
Dynatest performed deflection testing and analysis to determine the alternative rehabilitation recommendations.
|
 |
Redding Municipal Airport, CA |
|
Dynatest performed deflection testing and analysis to determine the alternative rehabilitation recommendations.
|
 |
Desert Resort Municipal Airport, Thermal, CA |
|
Dynatest performed deflection testing and analysis to determine the alternative rehabilitation recommendations.
|
|
Boston Logan International Airport. |
|
Dynatest performed deflection testing and analysis on all airside pavements to determine the alternative rehabilitation recommendations.
|
 |
|
